SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 434

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MANOJ KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-5611-2019(O&M)

Date of Decision: 10.09.2025 Manoj Kumar ........ Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and ors. ......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present:- Mr.Amit Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Komal Sharma, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Vishal Garg, Advocate for respondent No.3.

****

HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)

By way of present revision petition challenge has been laid to an order dated 13.08.2019 (P-5) passed by the learned Reference Court-cum-learned Additional District Judge, Gurugram; whereby an application preferred under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC at the instance of petitioner being “person interested”, in the pending proceedings arising out of reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, stood declined.

2. Briefly stating, the petitioner happened to be co-sharer in the land comprised in Rectangle No. 135, Killa No. 11 min West (5- 12), 20 min West (6-6), 21 min West (6-18), Rectangle No. 136, Killa No. 6/2/1 min. West (1-11), 15/2 (3-8), 16/1(3-8), 25/2(3-6), total Kitta 7, total measuring 30 Kanal 9 Marla to the extent of 10/108 share situated within the revenue estate of Village Patli Hazip

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top