SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 15823

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARVINDER KAUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


the petitioner’s husband in the year 2012, the private respondents took possession of the aforesaid land, and the petitioner got the possession back, vide possession proceedings dated 10.05.2022 (Annexure P-1).

2.1 It is stated that the private respondents again took possession of the aforesaid land and further proceeded to cut and remove the crops therefrom, whereupon the petitioner approached the local police authorities, but no action was taken.

2.2 The petitioner further states that she submitted a representation before the learned Deputy Commissioner, Mini Secretariat, Patiala (respondent No.2), seeking fresh demarcation and restoration of possession; whereupon, notices/orders dated 10.05.2025 (Annexure P-3), 10.06.2025 (Annexure P-4) and 04.07.2025 (Annexure P-5) were issued by the concerned revenue authorities. However, despite the passing of the said orders, the demarcation proceedings have not been carried out.

3. In the aforementioned circumstances, petitioner has filed the present writ petition before this Court, seeking relief(s) as noticed hereinabove.

4. Heard.

5. The petitioner claims to be the owner of the aforementioned land and as per her own pleadings, the possession

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top