IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARVINDER KAUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
the petitioner’s husband in the year 2012, the private respondents took possession of the aforesaid land, and the petitioner got the possession back, vide possession proceedings dated 10.05.2022 (Annexure P-1).
2.1 It is stated that the private respondents again took possession of the aforesaid land and further proceeded to cut and remove the crops therefrom, whereupon the petitioner approached the local police authorities, but no action was taken.
2.2 The petitioner further states that she submitted a representation before the learned Deputy Commissioner, Mini Secretariat, Patiala (respondent No.2), seeking fresh demarcation and restoration of possession; whereupon, notices/orders dated 10.05.2025 (Annexure P-3), 10.06.2025 (Annexure P-4) and 04.07.2025 (Annexure P-5) were issued by the concerned revenue authorities. However, despite the passing of the said orders, the demarcation proceedings have not been carried out.
3. In the aforementioned circumstances, petitioner has filed the present writ petition before this Court, seeking relief(s) as noticed hereinabove.
4. Heard.
5. The petitioner claims to be the owner of the aforementioned land and as per her own pleadings, the possession
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.