SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 11347

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KRISHAN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH [211] CRM-M-89-2024 Date of Decision: 11.09.2025 KRISHAN KUMAR ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ... RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- Mr. Vinod Ghai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Edward Augustine George, Advocate and Mr. Arnav Ghai, Advocate, and Mr. R.S. Bagga, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Amrik Narwal, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Nonish Kumar, Advocate for the complainant.

****

H.S. Grewal, J.(Oral)

1. This petition has been filed for grant of regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS (439 of Cr.P.C) in case FIR No. 19 dated 17.01.2019 under Sections 302, 392, 120-B, 216, 148, 149 and 420 of IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Tarori, Karnal.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner alongwith his co- accused had fired gun shots upon the deceased-Vikas @ Pintu. It is further argued that the weapon used by the petitioner is not connected to the occurrence through FSL evidence. Moreover, the petitioner has undergone a period of 04 years, 05 months and 17 days as under trial. Although, he is involved in many cases, however, in this case, his custody is nearly four and half

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top