IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

201 CWP-15211-2022 Date of Decision: 12.09.2025 Kamla Devi …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Ms. Surinder Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Suneel Ranga, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana Ms. Rahish Pahwa, Advocate for respondent No.5 ***

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)

1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order/letter dated 27.08.2019 and 19.09.2019 whereby her pension has been ordered to be deducted.

2. On 18.07.2022, this Court passed the following order: -

“Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the recovery from the pension is being made by the respondents on the ground that pension of the petitioner was wrongly fixed by the respondents and the petitioner has been extended the pension beyond his entitlement, which excess payment needs to be recovered from the petitioner.

Learned counsel argues that keeping in view the settled principle of law settled by the Supreme Court in State of Punjab Vs. Raqif Masih, 2015(1) S. C. T. 195, no recovery can be made from the