SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 15973

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COLONEL JAGPREET SINGH BAKSHI AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH Court OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

204 Date of Decision: 12.09.2025 COLONEL JAGPREET SINGH BAKSHI AND ANR ...Petitioners Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Navdeep Singh, Advocate, Mr. Rajesh Sehgal, Advocate and Mr. Arun Singla, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Rohit Verma, Senior Panel Counsel, assisted by Major Partho Katyayan, for the respondents.

*****

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL)

1. In the present Criminal Writ petition, the challenge is to the order dated 07.05.2025 (Annexure P-12) passed by the learned Armed Forces Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as ‘Tribunal’), by which the plea raised by the petitioners before the Tribunal that the initiation of the Court Martial proceedings against them is time barred keeping in view the Section 122 of the Army Act 1950, has been rejected, which is causing them prejudice.

2. It may be noticed that certain facts need to be mentioned hereinafter for the correct appreciation of the issue in hand.

2.1 Petitioners, while posted at Jalandhar, were entrusted with execution of the operationa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top