SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 16052

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJEEV KAUSHIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


S. No.101 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****

CRM-M-51486 of 2025 Date of Decision:15.09.2025 Rajeev Kaushik .....Petitioner Vs.

State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present:- Mr. V.P. Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Vasundhara Dalal Anand, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Baljinder Singh, Advocate for the complainant.

****

Yashvir Singh Rathor, J. (Oral)

1. This is a petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.0280 dated 21.08.2025 registered under Sections 406, 420 IPC at Police Station City Mandi Dabwali, District Dabwali.

2. The present case was registered on the basis of complaint given to the Police by Vikramjeet Singh with the allegations that Rajeev Kaushik, Advocate is an Itmam/ Manager of Mandir Kaladhari Murti Thakurdas Ji, which owns 59 kanals 04 marlas of land and said Rajeev Kaushik executed an agreement to sell the land in his favour vide agreement dated 18.12.2023 for a total consideration of Rs.92,44,000/- and the amount was transferred in the personal account of Rajeev Kaushik. Said Rajeev Kaushik also paid some amounts to the tenants, who

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top