208 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-5587-2022 (O&M)

Date of decision: 15.09.2025 Tarun Salhotra ...Petitioner Versus Anu Sareen and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Avnish Mittal, Advocate and Ms. Ishika Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vineet Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent No.1.

****

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

1. Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated 26.08.2022 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ambala, vide which, while allowing the application filed by the petitioner under Order 14 Rule 5 CPC for framing additional issue as to whether there was relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties, the Rent Controller had wrongly put the onus on the tenant-petitioner to prove the said issue. Challenge is also to the order dated 15.11.2022 passed by the same Court, vide which, an application filed by the petitioner-tenant for recalling the abovesaid order dated 26.08.2022 had also been dismissed.

ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER:-

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the present case, respondent No.1-alleged landlord-Ms. Anu Sareen had filed