IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision :16.09.2025 AMITA DHULL ALIAS AMEETA DHULL ... APPELLANT VERSUS PRIYA RANI AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Pardeep Sehrawat, Advocate for the petitioner.

****

PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL)

1. The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner- defendant, who is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 25.07.2025 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kurukshetra. By this order, the application filed by the plaintiff-applicant seeking re-examination of PW-3, Sh. AC. Rana, was allowed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has challenged the impugned order on the ground that the petitioner, by seeking re-examine PW-3, intends to fill the lacuna in the evidence. This precise argument was also advanced by the petitioner before the learned Court of first instance. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment titled as Shubhkaran Singh vs. Abhayraj Singh and others, Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 12012-12013 of 2025, decided on 05.05.2025.

3. The principle of law regarding the circumstances under which a witness can be recalled and re-examined is well settled, duly