IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

276 CRM-M-24224-2025(O&M)

Decided on: 16.09.2025 AAKASH . . . Petitioner(s)

Versus STATE OF HARYANA . . . Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Anmol Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Brijesh Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

None for complainant/victim.

****

KIRTI SINGH , J. (Oral)

1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Section 483 of BNSS for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.333 dated 08.11.2024, under Sections 351(2) and 64(2)(m) of BNS and Section 6 of POCSO Act, registered at Police Station Quilla Panipat, District Panipat. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, which was lodged on the complaint moved by the mother of the prosecutrix, alleging therein that the petitioner has committed wrong acts with her daughter. It is submitted that there is a delay of 27 days in registration of the aforesaid FIR. Further, there is no direct evidence to prove the complicity of the petitioner. In fact, the prosecutrix had herself refused to undergo medical examination. Rather, the UPT test of the prosecutrix also