SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 31

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
BACHITTAR KAUR – Appellant
Versus
M.C. PATIALA AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Judgment reserved on 20.08.2025 Judgment pronounced on 16.09.2025 SMT. BACHITTAR KAUR (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS.

... APPELLANTS VERSUS PATIALA MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, PATIALA AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENTS COCP-691-2002 (O&M)

THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PATIALA ... PETITIONER VERSUS RAJINDER SINGH SIDHU AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Amit Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Chetan Salathia, Advocate for the appellants (in RSA-134 of 1993) and for the respondent(s) in COCP-691-2002.

Mr. Rupinder Singh Khosla, Senior Advocate with Mr. Yogender Verma, Advocate for the respondent-MC Patiala (in RSA-134 of 1993) and for the petitioner(s) in COCP-691-2002.

****

PARMOD GOYAL, J.

1. The present appeal has been preferred by the plaintiff-appellant, whose suit for permanent injunction was decreed by the learned Court of Sub Judge, Ist Class, Patiala, vide judgment and decree dated 03.12.1988. However, the first appeal preferred by the defendant was allowed vide judgment and decree dated 31.10.1992 by the learned Additional District Judge, Patiala, thereby dismissing the suit of the plaintiff.

2. The plainti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top