IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 17.09.2025 Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran, Gurugram ...Appellant Versus Shyam Kumari and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, Advocate and Mr. Siddhanth Arora, Advocate for Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Keshav Pratap Singh, Advocate and Mr. Sanskar Dhanda, Advocate for contesting respondent No. 1-landowner (Shyam Kumari)

Mr. Abhinash Jain, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for pro forma respondent Nos. 2 & 3.

****

HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)

CM-3170-CI-2022 Prayer in the present application, filed under Order 41 Rule 27 of CPC, moved by the applicant-appellant/HSVP, is for seeking permission to lead additional evidence in the shape of copy of CWP No. 4753 of 2013, annexed with the paper-book as Annexure A-

1.

This Court, vide order dated 09.11.2022, admitted the main appeal while passing orders to hear the instant application with the main case.

Notice of the application.

Learned counsel for the non-applicant/respondent No. 1 accepts notice and does not oppose the prayer made in the application.

Learned counsel for the parties have been heard.

A