255 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 17.09.2025 Rachneet Kaur Jaggi ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE AARADHNA SAWHNEY Present: Mr. Munish Behl, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana.

***

AARADHNA SAWHNEY , J. (ORAL)

1. The present petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioner, an accused praying for issuing appropriate directions to the learned trial Court/CJM, Ambala, to allow her to furnish surety bonds, in all the 31 cases (the details mentioned in para 3 of the petition), in which she has been released on bail, by single individual on the ground that she is not in a position to arrange 31 different persons to furnish surety.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and is facing trial in 31 criminal cases at Ambala. She has been granted the concession of bail in each of the above mentioned 31 cases but is not in a position to arrange separate sureties in these cases. The condition so imposed is onerous and if not modified, would negate the orders vide whi