IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

201 CR-3930-2016 Date of decision: 17.09.2025 Nazam Singh ....Petitioner Versus Baldev Singh ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: Mr. Navjot Singh, Advocate for Ms. Dhivya, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rahul Vijay Singh Chugh, Advocate with Mr. Lokesh Singh, Advocate for the respondent.

****

NIDHI GUPTA, J (ORAL)

1. Present revision petition has been filed by defendant against the order dated 09.02.2016 (Annexure P-1) passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Mansa, whereby application filed by the petitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. has been disposed of, taking into account the fact that petitioner had not yet filed written statement in the suit and that the objection under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC could be taken by the petitioner in his written statement.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner assails the impugned order by submitting that the learned Trial Court has failed to appreciate that the plaintiff- respondent has cleverly drafted the suit Annexure P-2 in a manner that no prayer for possession has been made; whereas in actual, the plaintiff is also seeking possession of the suit