SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 16396

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GREATER LUDHIANA AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY GLADA – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 17.09.2025 Greater Ludhiana Area Development Authority (GLADA) and another ..... Petitioners VERSUS National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA Present: Mr. D.V. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shivani Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.

*****

DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA, J.

1. In the present writ petition, the petitioners (GLADA) have challenged the order dated 07.11.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NCDRC’) in First Appeal No.2171 of 2018 and the order dated 01.06.2018 (Annexure P-2) passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab, (hereinafter referred to as the ‘SCDRC’) in Consumer Complaint No.883 of 2017, whereby, the complaint filed by respondent No.3-complainant was partly allowed and was held entitled for grant of refund of deposited amount and transfer fee along with interest and compensation.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioners-Greater Ludhiana Area Development

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top