SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 16416

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SANDEEP SHEKHAWAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 09.09.2025 Pronounced on: 17.09.2025 Sandeep Shekhawat ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Dr. Jasmine Gill, AAG, Haryana.

****

ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections

204 21.12.2023 Satlani, Distt. 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 120-B IPC Mohindergarh

1. The petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above had come up before this Court under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking regular bail.

2. As per paragraph 17 of the bail petition, the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. However, as per paragraph 11 of the status report, the petitioner has the following criminal antecedents:

Sr. No. FIR No. Dated Offenses Police Station

1. 15 02.02.2024 420, 467, 468, 471 and Satnali

120-B IPC

2. 351 02.08.2024 420, 467, 468, 471 and City Bhiwani

120-B IPC

3. The facts and allegations are being taken from the status report filed by the State, which reads as follows:

“4. That the brief facts of the case are that on 21.12.2023, a complaint no.1117-HA dated 31.10.2023 written by com

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top