IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SANDEEP SHEKHAWAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 09.09.2025 Pronounced on: 17.09.2025 Sandeep Shekhawat ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Dr. Jasmine Gill, AAG, Haryana.
****
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections
204 21.12.2023 Satlani, Distt. 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 120-B IPC Mohindergarh
1. The petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above had come up before this Court under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking regular bail.
2. As per paragraph 17 of the bail petition, the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. However, as per paragraph 11 of the status report, the petitioner has the following criminal antecedents:
Sr. No. FIR No. Dated Offenses Police Station
1. 15 02.02.2024 420, 467, 468, 471 and Satnali
120-B IPC
2. 351 02.08.2024 420, 467, 468, 471 and City Bhiwani
120-B IPC
3. The facts and allegations are being taken from the status report filed by the State, which reads as follows:
“4. That the brief facts of the case are that on 21.12.2023, a complaint no.1117-HA dated 31.10.2023 written by com
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.