SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 11448

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SANDEEP KAUR AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
SMT KIRAN AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

208-1 Date of decision: 17.09.2025 Sandeep Kaur and another ...Petitioner(s)

VERSUS Smt. Kiran and another ...Respondent(s)

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Harminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. J.S. Mahel, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr. DAG Punjab.

*****

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)

The instant petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner(s) in criminal complaint bearing No.COMA/206/2017 instituted on 28.09.2018 under Sections 323, 325, 452, 379-B, 411, 427, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, pending before the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gurdaspur, wherein the petitioners have been summoned vide order dated 13.01.2020.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners contends that respondent No.1-complainant had instituted the proceedings against three persons including the petitioners. He contends that the complainant is married to a Dy. Superintendent of Police in the State of Punjab and petitioner No.1’s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top