SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 11458

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DEEPAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

204 CRM-M-18665-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 17.09.2025 Deepak ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : Mr. Anshuman Dalal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Parmod Kumar, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate for respondent no.2.

AMAN CHAUDHARY, J.

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., for quashing of FIR No.128 dated 30.05.2023, registered under Section 63, 65 of Copy Right Act, 1957 (for short, ‘the Act’), at Police Station PGIMS, District Rohtak.

2. Succinctly, the facts that led to the registration of FIR are that the complainant-Anil Kumar, Field Manager, Speed Search Security Networks Pvt. Ltd., who claims to have the authorization of the said firm to take action if any fake product of M/s Usha International Ltd., M/s Indian Fan Manufacturers Association (IFMA) registered brand Usha, Anchor, V guard Industries Ltd. for their fans, coolers, mixers grinders is sold o r supplied, conducted a survey in Gandhi Nagar Area of Rohtak and found that one person namely Deepak (M/s New Meera Electronics) a re manufacturing, selling or su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top