SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 16722

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VINOD KUMAR MAHAJAN – Appellant
Versus
UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND OTHERS – Respondent


118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 22.09.2025 Vinod Kumar Mahajan ....Petitioner Versus Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Ms. Kiran Bala Jain, Advocate and Ms. Anjali Rani, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Additional A.G., Haryana.

HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL)

1. The present civil writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 09.01.2025 (Annexure P-6) passed by the respondents.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the petitioner was appointed as Junior Engineer in the year 1971 and he was promoted to Junior Engineer-I on 29.01.1997 and later on, as Assistant Engineer on 03.08.2005 and subsequently retired on 30.04.2007. The petitioner is placed at Serial No.197, whereas, his junior, namely, O.P. Gandhi is placed at Serial No.209 of the seniority list who is drawing a higher pay than the petitioner as discernible from the memo/letter dated 02.12.2016 (Annexure P-2). The petitioner is entitled to re-fix

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top