SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 221

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: September 22, 2025 Tejinderpal Singh .....Appellant Versus State of Punjab ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMARI Present: Mr. Saurabh Arora, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Raghav Garg, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab.

----

RAMESH KUMARI J.

1. Present appeal has been preferred by appellant-accused (hereinafter referred as ‘accused’) against judgment and order dated 06.01.2016 whereby he has been convicted and sentenced by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar Mohali, in case FIR No.24, dated 24.02.2015 registered under Sections 302, 363, 376-A IPC and Sections 4, 5 and 6 of The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as ‘POCSO Act’) at Police Station City Kharar, as under:-

Section RI Fine In default

363 IPC For 7 years Rs.2,000/- RI for one year

376-A Life Imprisonment - - 6 of POCSO Act Life imprisonment Rs.10,000/- -

All the substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

This appeal is filed by the accused under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C.

(corresponding Section 415 of BNSS) against the judgment of c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top