SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 16792

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 22.09.2025 Smt. Asmina and others ......Petitioners Versus Sajid ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: - Mr. Nafeesh Ahmed, Advocate, for the petitioners.

NAMIT KUMAR, J.

1. This revision petition has been filed for enhancement of maintenance allowance granted to the petitioners under Section 125 Cr.P.C. by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Nuh, vide order dated 19.12.2024.

2. Brief facts of the case as averred by the petitioners are that about 14/15 years ago, petitioner No.1 was married with the respondent according to Muslim rites and customs. Thereafter, they resided together and out of the said wedlock five children i.e. petitioners No.2 to 6 were born. However, respondent and his family members started harassing petitioner No.1 for demand of dowry as they were not happy with the dowry articles given at the time of marriage. Petitioner No.1 was maltreated and given beatings. It is further averred that petitioner No.1 was thrown out of her matrimonial home and the respondent performed second marriage without giving divorce to petitioner No.1. Consequently, petitioners filed a p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top