SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 18680

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

243 CRR(F)-275-2023(O&M)

Date of Decision: 23.09.2025 JAMIL AHMED ...Petitioner(s)

Versus KHURSHIDAN AND OTHERS ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present:- Dr. Pankaj Nanhera, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Arjun Attri, Advocate for respondents.

*****

KIRTI SINGH , J. (Oral)

1. The present petition has been preferred against the order dated 07.12.2022 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Nuh, Camp Court at Ferozpur Jhirka, in MNT No.239-2019 under Section 125 Cr.P.C., whereby the petition filed by the respondents has been allowed and the petitioner has been directed to pay a total maintenance allowance of Rs.12,000/- per month from the date of filing of the petition.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the marriage between the petitioner and respondent No.1 was solemnized about 26 years ago according to Muslim rites and ceremonies and five children were born from the said wedlock. Out of them, two children are married, while three are still minors. About five years prior to the filing of the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C., the petitioner solemnized a second marriage. Thereafter, matrimonial

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top