IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: September 23, 2025 Rachpal Singh alias Rashpal Singh ...Petitioner Versus Parvinder Singh Uppal ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present: Ms.Shruti Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Uday Agnihotri, Advocate for the respondent.

****

ARCHANA PURI, J. CM-17772-CII-2025 The present application has been filed for placing on record Annexure P-3.

In view of the averments made in the application, the same is allowed and Annexure P-3 is taken on record.

CR-3395-2024 Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated

20.12.2023 passed by learned Addl. District Judge, whereby, the petitioner- tenant was directed to pay mesne profits @ Rs.20,000/- per month, in addition to the contractual rent.

The essential facts, to be noticed, are as follows:-

That, the respondent-landlord had initially filed a petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, thereby, asserting about the petitioner to have been inducted as tenant in the month of March 2013, on the entire ground floor, consisting of two rooms, kitchen and bathroom of the house situated in Mohali and the rat