IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (304)

CR-1909-2022 (O&M)

Date of Decision: - 23.09.2025 Shri Thakur Dawara Ji Maharaj and another ....Petitioners Versus Mange Ram (since deceased) through LRs .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present:- Mr. Suryakant Gautam, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Rakesh Sobti, Advocate for LRs of the respondent.

****

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

1. Present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 28.03.2022 (Annexure P-2) passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Panipat, vide which the evidence of the petitioners/plaintiffs has been closed by court order.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in the present case, the petitioners/plaintiffs had filed a suit for recovery and thus, the delay in the proceedings, if any, would primarily prejudice the petitioners. It is further submitted that on 03.03.2020, four witnesses of the petitioners were present and it is counsel for the respondent/defendant who had sought an adjournment for cross-examination of the said four witnesses and the same was adjourned to 03.04.2020. It is state