IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KULDEEP SINGH ALIAS KULDIP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 09.09.2025 Pronounced on: 24.09.2025 Kuldeep Singh @ Kuldip Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Himmat Singh Deol, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, DAG, Haryana.
****
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections
30 18.02.2025 Sector-20, Panchkula 22(c) of NDPS Act (Section 29 of NDPS Act added later on)
1. The petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above had come up before this Court under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking regular bail.
2. As per paragraph 21 of the bail application, the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.
3. The facts and allegations are taken from the reply status report by the State. On 18.02.2025, based on secret information, the Police seized 2600 tablets containing tramadol, which weighed 338 grams from the possession of the main accused Raj Kapoor. The Investigator claims to have complied with all the statutory requirements of the NDPS Act, 1985, and BNSS, 2023.
4. During custodial interrogation, the main accused, Raj Kapoor, confessed before the Poli
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.