SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 17149

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PARDEEP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 10.09.2025 Pronounced on: 24.09.2025 Pardeep ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. R.K.Lathwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Atul Gaur, AAG, Haryana.

****

ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections

47 18.02.2024 IMT, Rohtak 406 IPC (Sections 407/420/465/

467/468/471/483/120-B/201 IPC added later on)

1. The petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above had come up before this Court under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking regular bail.

2. Per paragraph 18 of the bail application and 11 of the reply dated 04.09.2025 filed by the State, the accused has the following criminal antecedents:

Sr. No. FIR No. Date Offenses Police Station

1 786 11.10.2015 302/201/392/414/34 IPC Civil Lines, Karnal and Section 25 of Arms Act

2 109 2020 42 of Prisons Act Ram Nagar, Karnal

3. The facts and allegations are being taken from the reply filed by the State, which reads as follows:

2. That the facts of the case are that a complaint has been moved by complainant Ashok son of Raja Ram, resident of Village Boliya, Tehsil Gha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top