IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PARDEEP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 10.09.2025 Pronounced on: 24.09.2025 Pardeep ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. R.K.Lathwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Atul Gaur, AAG, Haryana.
****
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections
47 18.02.2024 IMT, Rohtak 406 IPC (Sections 407/420/465/
467/468/471/483/120-B/201 IPC added later on)
1. The petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above had come up before this Court under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking regular bail.
2. Per paragraph 18 of the bail application and 11 of the reply dated 04.09.2025 filed by the State, the accused has the following criminal antecedents:
Sr. No. FIR No. Date Offenses Police Station
1 786 11.10.2015 302/201/392/414/34 IPC Civil Lines, Karnal and Section 25 of Arms Act
2 109 2020 42 of Prisons Act Ram Nagar, Karnal
3. The facts and allegations are being taken from the reply filed by the State, which reads as follows:
“2. That the facts of the case are that a complaint has been moved by complainant Ashok son of Raja Ram, resident of Village Boliya, Tehsil Gha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.