SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 30

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SMT.SHANTI – Appellant
Versus
BANSI LAL – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision :24.09.2025 SMT. SHANTI AND OTHERS ... APPELLANTS VERSUS BANSI LAL AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Rupender Singh, Advocate and Mr. Devesh Nehra, Advocate for the appellants.

****

PARMOD GOYAL, J.

1. The appellants-claimants are aggrieved by the award of Rs. 50,000/- granted by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rohtak (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal’), vide award dated 26.07.2000 being insufficient amount of compensation.

2. The appellants-claimants had filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, seeking compensation on account of loss of dependency due to the death of Randhir Singh in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 14.06.1997, caused by the rash and negligent driving of respondent No. 1, the driver of the tractor bearing Engine No. 51828204867 and Chassis No.

118118688107.

3. The learned Tribunal decided Issue No. 1 in favour of the claimants, holding that the accident was the result of rash and negligent driving by respondent No. 1. Since no appeal has been preferred by any of the respondents against this finding,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top