IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (212) CRM-M-38162-2025 Date of Decision:- 08.10.2025 Aayush Aggarwal ……Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ……Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN ****
Present: Mr. Preetinder Singh Ahluwalia, Advocate and Ms. Bharti Kapur, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Swati Batra, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Naveen Kashyap, Advocate for the complainant.
*****
ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral)
1. The prayer is for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 378 dated 16.12.2024, registered under Sections 108, 123, 3(5), and 64(2)(m) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) at Police Station Sector-56, District Gurgaon.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the consensual relationship between the petitioner and the deceased turned sour, which allegedly led to the suicide of the prosecutrix. The FIR was lodged following the recovery of a suicide note. It is submitted that while the consensual nature of the relationship is not denied, still the ingredients of Section 108 of BNS are not satisfied, as there is no corroborative evidence apart from the suicide note to demonstrate that the petitioner instigated the deceased to take such an e
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.