SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 11598

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 08.10.2025 Mohammad Aslam .....Petitioner Versus State of U.T. Chd. and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Mr. Lalit Singla, Advocate and Ms. Varsha Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Narender Kumar Vashist, Addl. P.P. U.T. Chandigarh.

Mr. Kapil Khanna, Advocate for respondent No.2.

****

KIRTI SINGH , J. (ORAL)

1. Prayer in the first petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2024, praying is for quashing of case/FIR No.0268 dated 30.08.2020 under section 376(2) of IPC (offence under Section 323/506/509 IPC added later on) registered at Police Station Sector-39, Chandigarh (Annexure P-1) and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom including Challan report dated 04.12.2020 (Annexure P-4) and order of charge dated 23.09.2021 (Annexure P-5) as the matter has been compromised between the parties vide compromise deed dated 28.08.2024 (Annexure P-6).

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant FIR by levelling allegations of establishing physical relations on the false pretext of marriage, despite the fact that t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top