IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

223 CRM-M-45689-2025 Decided on : 13.10.2025 Arun Taneja . . . Petitioner(s)

Versus State of Haryana . . . Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT: Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Kanwar Sanjiv Kumar, AAG, Haryana.

****

SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral)

1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 439 Cr.P.C.), for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, during the pendency of trial, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed here-under:-

Name of FIR Date Section(s) Police District Petitioner(s) No. Station Arun Taneja 212 30.07.2023 406, 420 & 120-B of IPC, 1860 City Kurukshetra Pehowa

2. Complainant – Baljinder Kaur got registered the aforementioned FIR against; (i) Arun Taneja, (ii) Ved Parkash Taneja, (iii) Malook Singh Uppal, (iv) Gurpreet Singh Uppal, (v) Harpreet Singh Uppal, and (vi) Pradeep Kumar. As per allegations accused Arun Taneja projected his father – Ved Parkash Taneja before her as an agent of Sarvotam Vikas Multistate Housing Co-operative Society Limited and that this company used to given do