SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 17955

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AMIT ALIAS KHURCHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

208 Date of decision: 14.10.2025 AMIT ALIAS KHURCHAN ......Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA .......Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ *****

Present: - Mr. Naresh Kumar Chhokar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Chhavi Sharma, Asstt. A.G. Haryana.

*****

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)

The instant second petition has been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS seeking concession of regular bail in case bearing FIR No. 843 dated 02.10.2022, registered under Section(s) 148, 149, 302, 506, 34 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 of the Arms Act at Police Station Samalkha, District Panipat.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner was not named in the FIR and he had been nominated in the present case on the disclosure statement of co-accused. He further contends that only 02 prosecution witnesses (eye witness and the complainant) out of the total 25 have been examined so far, but both of them have not supported the case of the prosecution. It is submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 07.10.2022 and case of the petitioner would be very similar to the case of the co-accused Sa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top