SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 389

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIJAY KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision:27.10.2025 Vijay Kumar ....Petitioner V/s State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. D.S. Virk, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG Haryana.

Mr. Ankit Bishnoi, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 4.

*****

SUMEET GOEL, J.

1. The present criminal revision petition has been filed by the petitioner-complainant seeking setting aside of the impugned order dated 07.04.2021, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Sirsa, whereby the application filed under Section 319 Cr.P.C. moved by the prosecution for summoning the private respondents No.2 to 4, namely Baldev Singh son of Mani Ram, Vinod Kumar and Naresh Kumar sons of Om Parkash (respondent Nos.2 to 4 herein), to face the trial, has been dismissed.

2. Shorn of non-essential details, the relevant factual matrix of the lis in hand reads thus:

(i). FIR No.175 dated 17.07.2018 was registered at Police Station Ellenabad, District Sirsa, under Sections 323, 325, 326, 341, 367, 506 read with Section 34 IPC on the statement of the petitioner/complainant/injured namely Vijay Singh. In the said FIR, apart from the accus

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top