SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 62

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 05.09.2025 Pronounced on:- 27.10.2025 Ved Parkash and others ....Appellants Versus State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM:- HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present:- Mr. R.S. Cheema, Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. Sumanjit Kaur, Advocate, Mr. Satish Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Prince Bharol, Advocate for the appellants No. 1 and 2.

Proceedings qua appellant No. 3 Sunil Kumar stood abated.

Mr. Ayuwan Singh, AAG, Haryana.

*****

AMARJOT BHATTI, J.

1. Appellants/convicts Ved Parkash, Jagdish and Sunil Kumar have filed aforesaid appeal against judgment of conviction and order on quantum of sentence dated 23.12.2000 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Bhiwani in Sessions Case bearing No. 42 dated 26.10.1998, titled as “State Vs. Ved Parkash and others” in FIR No. 312 dated 06.06.1998 under Section 498-A, 304-B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) registered at Police Station City Bhiwani, District Bhiwani vide which appellants were sentenced as under :-

Name of Convict(s) Offence U/s Sentence

1. Ved Parkash 304-B of IPC To undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of 10 years each

2. Jagdish

3. Sunil Kumar

1. Ved Parkash 49

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top