IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-7570-2025 DECIDED ON: 27.10.2025 INDER SAIN (NOW DECEASED) THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS AND OTHERS .....PETITIONERS VERSUS RAM BHAGWAN AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Ms. Rahish Pahwa, Advocate and Mr. Saksham Dudeja, Advocate for the petitioner.

MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL)

1. The present civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned composite order dated 25.09.2025 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana, whereby two applications filed by respondent No. 1–plaintiff, one under Order VI Rule 17 CPC and another under Order I Rule 10 CPC, were allowed.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff–respondent No. 1 filed a suit for separate possession by way of partition and for permanent injunction, claiming himself to be a co-sharer along with the defendants, including the present petitioners, in the joint ancestral property inherited from a common ancestor. The petitioners, who were impleaded as defendants no. 3 to 6, filed their written statement raising several preliminary objections, inter alia