SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 36

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
P.S.E.B. – Appellant
Versus
MADAN LAL – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.-

RSA-1863-1993 (O&M) Reserved on:-15.10.2025 Pronounced on : 27.10.2025 Punjab State Electricity Board and Another ....Appellants VERSUS Madan Lal ....Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Ms. Jarnail Kaur Dhaliwal, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate for the respondent.

-.-

MANDEEP PANNU, J.

1. Present Regular Second Appeal has been filed by the appellants– defendants PSEB and another against the respondent–plaintiff Madan Lal, assailing the concurrent findings recorded by both the Courts below, whereby the suit filed by the plaintiff–respondent was decreed by the learned trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 26.10.1990, which was subsequently affirmed by the learned Additional District Judge, Sangrur vide judgment and decree dated

06.05.1993. Brief Facts

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the plaintiff filed a suit for declaration and mandatory injunction to the effect that the demand of ₹13,920/– raised by the defendants vide memo dated 02.06.1989 as additional charges is illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory, and further sought a direction to the defendants to adju

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top