IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on : 22.09.2025 Pronounced on : 28.10.2025 Gurpreet Singh & Anr. ....Appellants VERSUS Nirmal Kaur ....Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present : Mr. Amardeep Singh Gill, Advocate for the appellants.

ALKA SARIN, J.

1. The present regular second appeal has been preferred by the plaintiff-appellants against the judgements and decrees dated 04.12.2018 and 15.02.2022 passed by the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court dismissing the suit for permanent injunction.

2. The suit for permanent injunction was filed by the plaintiff- appellants averring that the parties being joint owners along with other co- shares were in possession of their respective shares of the suit property and were cultivating the same. The suit property had not been partitioned by metes and bounds and the defendant-respondent wanted to change the nature of suit property without getting it partitioned and also wanted to install wire on the valuable portion of the suit property. Hence, the suit for permanent injunction. In the written statement the defendant-respondent took the plea that the suit property was orally partitioned whereby p