SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 18439

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
BHOOMI DAHIYA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 28.10.2025 BHOOMI DAHIYA ... PETITIONER VS.

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .. RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Present: Mr. Anil Ghanghas, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Anil Chawla, Sr. Panel Counsel for respondents No.1 to 3.

Mr. Arun Gosian, Advocate for respondent No.4.

****

ROHIT KAPOOR , J.

1. The present writ petition has been filed for setting aside the impugned criteria contained in the brochure (Annexure P/1), for admission in B.Tech. Programme, being run by respondent No.3-National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management, which provides for filling up the left-over/vacant seats by way of on-spot counselling, only on the basis of the marks obtained in the 12th standard, by ignoring the marks in NEET/JEE/CUET (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NTA Exams). Further prayer has been made for directing the respondents to fill the left-over/vacant seats only in accordance with the marks/rank obtained by the candidates in the NTA Exams and to admit the petitioner on the basis of her merit, accordingly.

2. Shorn of unnecessary details, brief

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top