IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.-

CR-7503-2025 (O&M) Decided on:-28.10.2025 Sunil Dhawan And Others ....Petitioners VERSUS Anil Dhawan And Another ....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. R.S.Bajaj, Advocate for the petitioners.

-.-

MANDEEP PANNU J.

1. Present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 30.09.2025 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jalandhar, whereby the evidence of the petitioners–defendants was ordered to be closed by court order.

Brief Facts

2. The brief facts necessary for adjudication of the present petition are that the respondent–plaintiff filed a suit for partition by metes and bounds of all the immovable properties left behind by the father of petitioner No.1, claiming one- third share each, along with consequential relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendants from selling, mortgaging, alienating or creating any charge beyond their respective shares. A further declaration was sought to the effect that the transfer deed executed by petitioner No.1 in favour of petitioner No.3 is illegal, void and not binding on