208 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-21046-2021 Date of Decision : 28.10.2025 GUNJAN .....Petitioner VERSUS THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE CUM CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Mr. Tanmoy Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

Mr. Kamal Deep Sehra, Advocate &

Mr. Saurabh Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondent no.2.

Respondent no.3 ex parte.

KULDEEP TIWARI , J.(Oral)

1. Through the instant petition, the petitioner, who is a daughter-in-law, fetching grievance from order dated 13.09.2021 (Annexure P-1), passed by the learned District Magistrate-cum- Chairman, Senior Citizen Welfare and Maintenance of Parents, Apellant Tribunal, Palwal (respondent no.1), filed the instant petition, cast under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though opportunity of hearing was given to petitioner, and they were earlier proceeded against ex parte vide order dated 23.08.2021, however, on the application preferred by the petitioner, the said ex parte order was set aside, at the time of passing the impugned order, which clearly reflects that t