IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

226 RSA-2660-2013(O&M)

Date of decision: 29.10.2025 Harminder Singh ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

M/s Pritam Singh & Sons ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Vijay Kumar Goyal, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate Mr. Deepak Singh Saini, Advocate for the respondent.

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

Present second appeal has been filed by the defendant against the judgments and decrees of the learned Courts below whereby suit filed by the plaintiff/respondent for recovery of Rs.9,55,152.51/- i.e. Rs.7,11,739.51 paise on account of principal amount and Rs.2,43,413/- on account of interest, has been decreed in part by the learned trial court; and in totality by the learned First Appellate Court.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant/defendant vehemently submits that in decreeing the suit of the plaintiff, the learned First Appellate Court has grossly misread the evidence on record. It is submitted that suit of the plaintiff would not have been decreed as the plaintiff has failed to tender into evidence any document or any Account Book to show that there were any outstandings against the appellant. It is con