SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 610

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
............ – Appellant
Versus
............ – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 29.10.2025 Manmohan .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present : Mr. Sandeep Verma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rituraj Singh, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Arnav Mittal, Advocate for respondent No.2.

****

NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL)

CRM-30250-2025 The instant application has been filed by the petitioner for modification of order dated 24.07.2025 qua imposition of costs upon him.

Heard.

No ground to modify the order dated 24.07.2025 is made out. Moreso, the petitioner has already deposited the costs of Rs.50,000/- and produced the receipt thereof, and the same is taken on record.

Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.

CRM-M-37513-2019

1. By invoking Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (now Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023), the petitioner has prayed for quashing of FIR No.30 dated 28.10.2015 registered under Sections 406, 498-A, 376, 506 and 120-B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 at Women Police Station, Gurugram (Annexure P-1) and all other subsequent proceedings arising thereof on the basis of compromise arrived at bet

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top