SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 18753

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ASHWANI KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
RAJNI BALA AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (126 Date of Decision:-29.10.2025 ASHWANI KUMAR … Petitioner Versus RAJNI BALA AND OTHERS ... Respondents ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Mr. Manu Loona, Advocate for the petitioner ****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)

The present civil revision petition, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, has been instituted by the petitioner to assail the order dated 30.08.2025 (Annexure P-5) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jalalabad (West), whereby the learned Trial Court has dismissed the petitioner’s application filed under Order VII Rule 11 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short “CPC”), seeking rejection of the plaint on the ground of non-payment of the requisite court fee.

2. The petitioner has contended that, in view of the provisions contained in Section 7(v)(c) of the Court Fees Act, 1870, the plaintiff was mandatorily required to affix ad-valorem court fee, the relief sought being one for possession of the suit property. It is urged that the learned Civil Judge, while passing the impugned order, f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top