Object 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (149)

RFA-1291-2022 (O&M)

Date of decision: 29.10.2025 Dharampal and others ...Appellants Versus Devraj ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Sudhanshu Makkar, Advocate and Ms. Himani Makkad, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate and Mr. Harsh Vasu Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent.

****

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

This judgment has been divided into the following sections:-

CHALLENGE IN THE PRESENT APPEAL:-

1. Challenge in the present Regular First Appeal is to the judgment dated 17.10.2022 vide which the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff for permanent injunction under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, was allowed and the defendants/present appellants were restrained from continuing the business of sale of sarees under the name and style of ‘M/s. Vimal Saree Palace’ or ‘Vimal Wadhwa Saree Palace’, as the said trade name/sign board deceived the public at large, since the respondent/plaintiff was running his business of sale of sarees under the name and style of ‘Bimal Saree Centre’ in close vicinity, much prior to the defendants, since the year 1980 and earned goodwill and reputation and