SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 18918

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJPAL BAJAJ – Appellant
Versus
RANJEET SINGH – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 30.10.2025 RAJPAL BAJAJ …. PETITIONER V/S RANJEET SINGH …. RESPONDENT CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present : Dr. Rau PS Girwar, Advocate Ms. Archana Rau, Advocate Ms. K.T.Rau, Advocate Mr. Ashish Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

****

SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral)

1. Prayer in the instant petition is for quashing of complaint bearing No.NACT/25/2024 (Annexure P-6) filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short, ‘NI Act’) and summoning order dated 23.01.2024 (Annexure P-8) ) passed by the learned trial Court, Bathinda.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that material ingredients for constituting an offence under Section 138 of NI Act are not available and therefore cognizance could not have been taken against the present petitioner. Petitioner had helped the complainant/respondent in resolving the financial dispute between the respondent and one Rinku property dealer. In order to facilitate the dispute resolution, the petitioner had given one blank cheque without mentioning any date as a security. It was agreed between the petitioner and the respondent that once the dis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top