SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 18789

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJPAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

273 CRM-M-11321-2023 (O&M)

DECIDED ON: 30.10.2025 RAJPAL .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PRATAP SINGH Present: Mr. Sandeep Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. N.P. Chandel, AAG, Haryana.

SURYA PRATAP SINGH, J (ORAL)

1. The order dated 06.12.2017 (Annexure P-2) passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class Rewari, hereinafter being referred to as “trial Court” is under challenge in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, hereinafter referred to as “CrPC” only.

2. By virtue of abovementioned order, the learned trial Court while holding a trial for the commission of offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, declared the petitioner to be a proclaimed person, which led to FIR No.388 dated 30.07.2021 under Section

174-A of Indian Penal Code, Police Station Model Town, Rewari.

3. In nut-shell, the facts emerging from record are that the petitioner was facing a trial for the commission of offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, and during the course of abovementioned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top