SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 91

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KRISHNA DEVI AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
SATBIR AND ANR. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 29.10.2025 Date of decision: 31.10.2025 KRISHNA DEVI AND ORS. ..Appellants Versus SATBIR AND ANR. ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Shilak Ram Hooda, Advocate for appellant.

Mr. Rajneesh Malhotra, Advocate Ms. Manvi Verma, Advocate for respondent No.2.

SUDEEPTI SHARMA , J .

1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 01.06.2009 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sonepat (for short, 'the Tribunal’) in the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for enhancement of compensation granted to the claimants to the tune of Rs.7,15,850/- along with interest @ 7.5% per annum, on account of death of Anand Kumar in a Motor Vehicular Accident, occurred on 09.01.2008.

2. As sole issue for determination in the present appeal is confined to quantum of compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal, a detailed narration of the facts of the case is not required to be reproduced here for the sake of brevity.

SUBMISSIONS OF LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIE S

3. The learned counsel for the claimants-appellants contends that the amount assess

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top