IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 03.11.2025 HARWINDER SINGH ......Petitioner Vs KAPOOR SINGH ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Ajay Pal Singh Rehan, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C.).

Mr. L.M. Gulati, Advocate for the respondent.

****

HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral)

[1]. By way of present revision petition, challenge has been laid to the orders dated 18.05.2017 (Annexure P-2) and 26.04.2018 passed by the learned Courts below, whereby the application preferred at the instance of petitioner under Order 9 Rule 13 of CPC seeking setting aside the ex-parte judgment and decree dated 03.09.2014 stands dismissed.

[2]. Briefly stating, respondent filed a suit of permanent injunction against the petitioner-defendant No.1 as well as one Gurjit Singh. In the said suit, the petitioner-defendant No.1 was served through her daughter namely Simarjit Kaur on 14.01.2014, who was major at the relevant time. The service report in this regard is extracted hereunder:-

“Sir, It is requested that my father Harwinder Singh is residing at Mumbai and he visits home once or twice in a year.

Sd./- Simerjit Kaur d/o Harwinder Singh.

It is req