IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

216 Date of decision: November 4^th, 2025 Gopal @ Mintu .....Petitioner Versus Harbir and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Jayant Yadav, Advocate for Mr. P.R. Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Surender Saini, Advocate for respondents No.6-I, III (a and b), V and VI.

Mr. Rohit, Advocate for respondents No.2(a-c), 4(a), 6(II, IV), 7(II, IV) and 9(i-iii).

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

1. This is a revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 23.12.2021 (Annexure P-5) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gurugram, and order dated 27.01.2022 (Annexure P-9) passed by learned Additional District Judge, Narnaul, whereby application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC and appeal dated 25.12.2021 have been dismissed.

2. On 13.09.2022, a coordinate Bench of this was pleased to pass the following order:

“Present: Mr. P.R. Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner ---

Learned counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff submits that his application filed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC, seeking interim injunction in the suit for possession