SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 31

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ANIL KUMAR YADAV AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA ETC – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RESERVED ON: 15.10.2025 PRONOUNCED ON:04.11.2025 ANIL KUMAR YADAV AND OTHERS .....PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ETC.

.....RESPONDENT(S)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Rohan Moudgil, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Mayuri Lakhanpal Kalia, DAG Haryana Mr. R.K. Malik, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Dhull, Advocate for respondents No.3 to 12 SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J

1. Prayer The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Articles

226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the selection and appointments made vide order dated 02.04.1997 (Annexure P-8) of private respondents No.3 to 12 to the post of Agriculture Development Officers (ADOs) and to further issue a writ in the nature of mandamus seeking directions to the respondents to make appointments to the post of Agriculture Development Officers in accordance with the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in Jaskaran Singh's case and to prepare a common merit list of all the reserved and unreserved candidates and to select the backward classes category

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top