SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 335

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MOHINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

213 CWP-24763-2017 Date of Decision:04.11.2025 MOHINDER SINGH ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

.....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Surinder Gandhi, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ravi Partap Singh, DAG, Haryana.

JAGMOHAN BANSAL , J. (Oral)

1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 22.06.2017 whereby respondent has rejected his claim for arrears.

2. This is second round of litigation. The petitioner on the earlier occasion preferred CWP-1383 of 1996 which was disposed of vide order dated 23.03.2017. Order dated 23.03.2017 being a short order is reproduced below in toto:-

“Pursuant to earlier order dated 15.3.2017, Mr.

Subhash Yadav, IGP alongwith his staff is present in Court. They are not able to assist this Court in respect of consequential order passed pursuant to the retrospective promotion given to the petitioner to the cadre of Head Constable, Assistant Sub Inspector and Sub Inspector on 31.1.1989, 16.1.1997 and 10.8.2006 respectively. Such a promotion has been granted vide order dated

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top