CRM-M No.43257 of 2025 -1-

CRM-M No.44619 of 2025

234+293 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.43257 of 2025 Parveen @ Sonu ….. Petitioner versus State of Haryana ….. Respondent CRM-M No.44619 of 2025 Rohit @ Jagira .....Petitioner versus State of Haryana ..... Respondent Date of decision: 04.11.2025 CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ *****

Present :- Mr. Vikrant Rana, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-44619-2025.

Mr. V. P. Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-43257-2025.

Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

****

RAJESH BHARDWAJ , J. (Oral)

1. By this order, I dispose of the above mentioned two petitions arising out of the same FIR.

2. Both the petitions have been filed praying for the grant of regular bail to the petitioners in case bearing FIR No.0202, dated 06.08.2024, under Sections 115, 126, 3(5), 351(2) of BNS, 2023 (Sections 117(2), 109(1), 61(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3) and 351(3) of BNS added and Sections 3(5), 351(2) of BNS deleted during investigation), registered at Police Station Dadri City, District Charkhi Dadri.

case has been got registered on the statement of complainant, namely, Ravi Parkash. It was alleged that on 06.08.2024, the complainant along with his brother, namely, Harsh had gone to the Court at Charkhi Dadri and when they were returning, they were way laid by Mohit, Rohit @ Jagira (petitioner in CRM-M-44619-2025), Rohit @ Mehsha Ala. It was alleged that they stopped their vehicles. The complainant was taken out from the vehicle in which he was travelling. They caused injuries to the complainant with sticks, however he was rescued by his brother, namely, Harsh and friend, namely, Vikas. However, after causing injuries, they left the spot by threatening them. Thus the request was made to take legal action against the accused. On registration of the FIR, the investigation commenced. The complainant was medico legally examined. The petitioner, namely, Rohit @ Jagira (in CRM-M-44619-2025) was arrested on 04.11.2024. During the investigation, complicity of the petitioner, namely, Parveen @ Sonu (in CRM-M-43257-2025) surfaced and thus, he was also arrayed as an accused in the present case. Resultantly, he was arrested on 06.11.2024. Both the petitioners approached the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Charkhi Dadri praying for the grant of bail, however after hearing both the sides and finding no merit in the same, the learned Sessions Judge, Charkhi Dadri declined both the bail applications filed by the petitioners vide orders dated 17.01.2025 and 28.07.2025. Being aggrieved, the petitioner, namely, Parveen @ Sonu (in CRM-M- 43257-2025) earlier approached this Court by way of filing CRM-M- 18510-2025 praying for the grant of bail, however the same was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 26.05.2025. Hence being aggrieved, the praying for the grant of regular bail.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners have vehemently contended that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. They have submitted that the alleged occurrence in the present case had taken place on 06.08.2024 whereas the offence under Section 109 BNS has been added on 17.08.2024. They have submitted that the ocular version is not medically corroborated. They have submitted that the offence under Section 109 of BNS has been added only to make the case a serious one, however from the facts and circumstances and the medical record, no offence as alleged is made out. They have submitted that the petitioners are behind bars since the date of their arrest. They have submitted that though the petitioners are involved in other cases, however they are on bail in those cases. They have submitted that in the facts and circumstances, the petitioners deserve to be granted bail.

5. Status reports dated 27.10.2025 in both the petitions by way of an affidavit of Dheeraj Kumar, HPS, DSP, HQ, Charkhi Dadri on behalf of the respondent-State have been filed by the learned State counsel today in the Court and the